Descriptor pages for multiple versions of a publication may be retrieved. Users should carefully check the version or date to match publications to their needs.
In re Marriage of Petersen 
Access this Publication
Connect to the document
This document is one volume or edition of a serial (recurring) publication. Click here to access the entire series.
Sample text from the file
.ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court In re Marriage of Petersen, 2011 IL Caption in Supreme Court: In re MARRIAGE OF JANET KELLOGG PETERSEN, Appellant, and KEVIN PETERSEN, Appellee. Docket No. Filed September 22, 2011 Held (Note: This syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.) An ex-wife's petition for her children's college expenses pursuant to the divorce decree's reservation clause sought modification which was subject to the statutory ban on retroactive support insofar as it requested prepetition expenses, but they could be looked to in determining whether she had depleted her financial resources for purposes of recalculating what percentage share the ex-husband should pay and what his obligation should be for postpetition educational expenses. Decision Under Review Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of C
200 East Capitol
Document Descriptive Information
- Date Accepted Into Depository: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:23:10 UTC
- Checksum Algorithm: MD5 SHA1
- Document File Checksum:
- 110984.pdf - checksum='3344761320' byte count= '98289'
- 110984s.pdf - checksum='4283113723' byte count= '83359'
Other Descriptions Supplied by the Issuing Agency
- contactCity: Springfield
- contactOrganization: Illinois Supreme Court
- contactPhoneNumber: 217-782-7821
- contactState: IL
- contactZipCode: 62701-1720
- dateCreated: 09 22 2011
- dateLastModified: 09 22 2011
- description: Justice Freeman delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Thomas, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Theis took no part in the decision. The Cook County parties to this dispute married in 1983 and had three children. In 1996 they separated, and a judgment of marriage dissolution was entered in 1999. Since the children were not yet ready for college, the court, in entering the divorce decree, reserved the issue of future college expenses and retained jurisdiction to enforce the judgment.
- govType: State
- language: EN-English
- numberOrIssue: September 22
- originatorDepartment: Supreme Court
- originatorJurisdiction: Illinois
- originatorOffice: Illinois
- volumeOrYear: 2011