Descriptor pages for multiple versions of a publication may be retrieved. Users should carefully check the version or date to match publications to their needs.
People v. Madrigal 
Access this Publication
Connect to the document
This document is one volume or edition of a serial (recurring) publication. Click here to access the entire series.
Sample text from the file
.Docket No. 110194. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STAT OF ILLINOIS THE PEOP LE OF TH ST ATE OF LLINOIS, Appellant, v. CLAUDIA MADRIGAL, Appellee. Opinion filed March 24, 2011. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Ju stice Kilbr ide and ustices Freeman, Garman, Karmeier, Burke, and heis concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION Defendant, Claudia Madrigal, was indicted in the circuit court of Kane Co unty ne co unt ide ntity heft in violation of section 16G-15(a)(7) of he Identity Theft Law (720 ILCS 5/16G-15(a)(7) (West 8)). Se ction 6G-15(a)(7) prov ides th at " [a] pe rson commits the offense of identity theft when he or she knowingly * uses any personal identification information or personal identification document of another for the purpose of gaining access to any record of the actions taken, communications made or received, or other activities ransactions of that erson, withou he prior express permission of that person." ILCS 5/16G-15(a)(7)
200 East Capitol
Document Descriptive Information
- Date Accepted Into Depository: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:03:44 UTC
- Checksum Algorithm: MD5 SHA1
- Document File Checksum:
- 110194.pdf - checksum='3061088690' byte count= '104736'
- 110194s.pdf - checksum='428276902' byte count= '86478'
Other Descriptions Supplied by the Issuing Agency
- contactCity: Springfield
- contactOrganization: Illinois Supreme Court
- contactPhoneNumber: 217-782-7821
- contactState: IL
- contactZipCode: 62701-1720
- dateCreated: 03 24 2011
- dateLastModified: 03 24 2011
- description: JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Garman, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion. The Identity Theft Law contains a number of different provisions. Only one of them is at issue in this appeal. A violation of the Identity Theft Law requires general knowledge that one is committing the actions specified.
- govType: State
- language: EN-English
- numberOrIssue: March 24
- originatorDepartment: Supreme Court
- originatorJurisdiction: Illinois
- originatorOffice: Illinois
- volumeOrYear: 2011