Descriptor pages for multiple versions of a publication may be retrieved. Users should carefully check the version or date to match publications to their needs.
Carr v. Gateway, Inc. 
Access this Publication
Connect to the document
This document is one volume or edition of a serial (recurring) publication. Click here to access the entire series.
Sample text from the file
.Supreme Court Summaries Opinions filed February 3, 2011 No. Carr v. Gateway, Inc. Appellate citation: Ill. App. 3d 1079. JUSTICE GARMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion. This Madison County litigation arose from the 2001 purchase of computer which had allegedly been misrepresented as to its speed. Defendant vendor, Gateway, Inc., sought to dismiss the suit and compel arbitration based on what it claimed was sales contract. In that purported agreement, the National Arbitration Forum was designated as the exclusive arbitrator. Gateway filed motion to dismiss the suit or compel arbitration, which was denied, and it appealed. The appellate court then had to deal with the fact that the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) had stopped accepting consumer arbitrations. That court noted that the NAF had been designated as the exclusive arbitration forum, with no
200 East Capitol
Document Descriptive Information
- Date Accepted Into Depository: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:31:03 UTC
- Checksum Algorithm: MD5 SHA1
- Document File Checksum:
- 109485.pdf - checksum='3472204796' byte count= '119320'
- 109485s.pdf - checksum='2913988900' byte count= '80472'
Other Descriptions Supplied by the Issuing Agency
- contactCity: Springfield
- contactOrganization: Illinois Supreme Court
- contactPhoneNumber: 217-782-7821
- contactState: IL
- contactZipCode: 62701-1720
- dateCreated: 02 03 2011
- dateLastModified: 02 03 2011
- description: JUSTICE GARMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion. This Madison County litigation arose from the 2001 purchase of a computer which had allegedly been misrepresented as to its speed.
- govType: State
- language: EN-English
- numberOrIssue: February 3
- originatorDepartment: Supreme Court
- originatorJurisdiction: Illinois
- originatorOffice: Illinois
- volumeOrYear: 2011